Published on :

A Canadian judge has rejected a request by Huawei CFO Meng Wanzhou, who wanted testimonies from employees of the Chinese telecoms giant to be admitted as evidence to fight his extradition to the United States.

Lawyers from Meng Wanzhou, 49, believe that these sworn statements could show that the HSBC bank was aware of the links between Huawei and its subsidiary Skycom which operated in Iran, contrary to what the American justice affirms. This evidence would help to demonstrate that the prosecution case against Meng Wanzhou is ” obviously unreliable “, According to the lawyers.

►Also read: Huawei: Trudeau refuses to intervene in the extradition process of Meng Wanzhou

The United States accuses Meng Wanzhou of lying to HSBC, during a meeting in 2013, about the links between Huawei and its subsidiary, at the risk of pushing the bank to violate American sanctions against this country without knowing it. They want to try her for bank fraud. In a decision released Friday evening, Justice Heather Holmes of the Supreme Court of British Columbia ruled that the testimony requested by the defense of Meng Wanzhou “ fell within the scope of a trial, not an extradition hearing “.

Fight his extradition

These depositions would only give a new version of the facts opposing that of the American justice, “ which would be beyond the true scope of an extradition hearing “, according to her. Last weekend, Huawei confirmed that Meng Wanzhou had taken legal action against HSBC in Hong Kong to obtain documents that it plans to use to fight her extradition. Last February, she lost a similar lawsuit in London.

The extradition hearings of Meng Wanzhou, who has lived under house arrest in Vancouver since his arrest in late 2018 at the request of the United States, have entered their final phase. They are due to resume on Monday and end in mid-May in Vancouver.

(with AFP)